“Hardliners” Insist on Victory and Unity After the Iranian Parliamentary Elections



On February 21, Iran held elections for its 11th Parliament. These latest elections marked the lowest voter turnout in over four decades in Iran. Predictably, they also led to a hardline takeover of Parliament after a state-led disqualification of major “reformist” candidates. This political wrangling between the hardline and “reformist” camps, along with growing public dissatisfaction in Iran, led to a 42.57 percent nationwide participation in the recent elections.

Still, “hardliners” reject that their victory was hollow. They blame lower voter turnout on the propaganda of  exiled opposition groups which dissuaded Iranians from participating in the polls after the outbreak of the coronavirus in Iran. Rejecting that the disqualification of “reformist” candidates may have also led to a less-than-ideal voter turnout rate, the “hardliners” also blame the current 10threformist”-led Parliament in Iran for under-performing.

After the elections, political rifts between the “reformists” and “hardliners” appear to have widened. The hardline Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the latest elections showed that Iran was a religiously-led democracy, given that 37 elections have been held in the last 41 years since the victory of the Islamic Revolution in 1979. But President Hassan Rouhani, who is supported by most “reformists”, warned that the new members of Parliament had to represent the entire country and not just their supporters. The “hardliners” say he is incapable of running the country, given the frequent anti-government protests, and is in no position to tell them what to do.

Defiantly, Iran’s “hardliners” – otherwise called the “principlists” – insist that they have a strong support base irrespective of the fact that mass disqualifications may have either barred or dissuaded prominent “reformists” from competing against them. In Iran’s provinces, “hardliners” claim they have had a major victory. Nearly 71 percent of the people in the Province of Kehgoliyeh and Boyerahmad, for example, and 43 percent in Qom, voted, and mostly for “hardliners”. In the capital Tehran, 1,259 candidates competed in the elections, in a city where most middle-class residents have generally voted for “reformist” candidates. Only 26.2 percent of eligible voters – just 2,539,763 of the capital’s residents – participated in the elections. The “hardliners” managed to win all the capital’s designated 30 parliamentary seats.

The top two “principlist” candidates and potential presidential candidates from Tehran were the former mayor Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf and Seyyed Mostafa Agha MirSaleem. They each won 1,265,287 and 892,318 votes respectively. At least 14 “hardliners” loyal to the former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won seats in the recent elections. This includes the former head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Agency Fereydoon Abbassi, the former Minister of Transport and Urban Planning Ali Nikzad, the former Minister of Communications Reza Taghipoor, the former Deputy Minister of Planning Golam Hossein Rezvani, and the former head of the hardline Fars News Agency Seyyed Nezamoldin Mousavi.

In contrast, Majid Ansari who is a “reformist” and deputy for parliamentary affairs for President Rouhani won only 69,151 votes and came 36th in Tehran. The former mayor of Tehran and head of the “reformist” Executives for Construction faction Golam Hossein Karbaschi failed to win a seat. Alireza Mahjoob won the highest number of votes cast for the “reformists” in Tehran, 95,393, which put him 34th on the list, whereas the last “principlist” winner of Tehran’s 30-memberlist won 642,214 votes.

The “hardliners” also like to highlight that only 56 of the current members of Parliament were voted back despite the fact that 248, out of a total number of 290 current sitting members of Parliament, either ran in the elections or registered to run before being disqualified. With election results in, it turns out that 223 “principlists”, 36 independents, and 19 “reformists” have so far won seats. In less than two months, Iran will hold a second round of voting for candidates who received fewer votes to determine the setup of its next Parliament. Overall, the new Parliament which will start work in 12 weeks is expected to show an 81 percent change in its setup compared to the 10th Parliament.

The “hardliners” claim that the election outcomes indicate that Iranians have turned away from the “reformists”, who could now face political extinction, and have embraced the “principlists”. In return, the hardline Coalition Council of the Islamic Revolution Forces, headed by Gholam Hossein Hadad Adel, insists that his camp will fix the ailing Iranian economy.

Moving forward, the “hardliners” also seem keen on building new coalitions. To this end, members of two main hardline factions from the Coalition Council, the paydari and vahdat, have vowed to work on forming a strong parliamentary bloc to ensure that the people of Iran will continue to support them. This goal can be achieved, they insist, by defying the “reformist” liberal agenda for Iran, and fixing the differences within the hardline camp.

Editorial Team